Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

15 \(\Rightarrow\) 102 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
15 \(\Rightarrow\) 30	The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 53 problem 4.12
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62	clear
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 102	The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 162 problem 11.12

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
15:	\(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle: For every set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(\|A\|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 81(\(n\)).
30:	Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered.
62:	\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.
102:	For all Dedekind finite cardinals \(p\) and \(q\), if \(p^{2} = q^{2}\) then \(p = q\). Jech [1973b], p 162 prob 11.12.

Comment:

Back