We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

359 \(\Rightarrow\) 315
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
359 \(\Rightarrow\) 20 clear
20 \(\Rightarrow\) 21 clear
21 \(\Rightarrow\) 23 Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, [1982]
23 \(\Rightarrow\) 25 Über dichte Ordnungstypen, Hausdorff, F. 1907, Jber. Deutsch. Math.
25 \(\Rightarrow\) 315 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
359:

If \(\{A_{x}: x\in S\}\) and \(\{B_{x}: x\in S\}\) are families  of pairwise disjoint sets and \( |A_{x}| \le |B_{x}|\) for all \(x\in S\), then \(|\bigcup_{x\in S}A_{x}| \le |\bigcup_{x\in S} B_{x}|\).

20:

If \(\{A_{x}: x \in S \}\) and \(\{B_{x}: x \in  S\}\) are families  of pairwise disjoint sets and \( |A_{x}| = |B_{x}|\) for all \(x\in S\), then \(|\bigcup_{x\in S}A_{x}| = |\bigcup_{x\in S} B_{x}|\). Moore [1982] (1.4.12 and 1.7.8).

21:

If \(S\) is well ordered, \(\{A_{x}: x\in S\}\) and \(\{B_{x}: x\in S\}\) are families of pairwise disjoint sets, and \(|A_{x}| = |B_{x}|\) for all \(x\in S\), then \(|\bigcup_{x\in S}A_{x}|= |\bigcup_{x\in S} B_{x}|\). G\.

23:

\((\forall \alpha)(UT(\aleph_{\alpha},\aleph_{\alpha}, \aleph_{\alpha}))\): For every ordinal \(\alpha\), if \(A\) and every member of \(A\) has cardinality \(\aleph_{\alpha}\), then \(|\bigcup A| = \aleph _{\alpha }\).

25:

\(\aleph _{\beta +1}\) is regular for all ordinals \(\beta\).

315:

\(\Omega = \omega_1\), where
\(\Omega = \{\alpha\in\hbox{ On}: (\forall\beta\le\alpha)(\beta=0 \vee (\exists\gamma)(\beta=\gamma+1) \vee\)
there is a sequence \(\langle\gamma_n: n\in\omega\rangle\) such that for each \(n\),
\(\gamma_n<\beta\hbox{ and } \beta=\bigcup_{n<\omega}\gamma_n.)\} \)

Comment:

Back