Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

27 \(\Rightarrow\) 38
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
27 \(\Rightarrow\) 31 clear
31 \(\Rightarrow\) 6 clear
6 \(\Rightarrow\) 5 L’axiome de M. Zermelo et son rˆole dans la th´eorie des ensembles et l’analyse, Sierpi'nski, W. 1918, Bull. Int. Acad. Sci. Cracovie Cl. Math. Nat.
5 \(\Rightarrow\) 38 Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
27:

\((\forall \alpha)( UT(\aleph_{0},\aleph_{\alpha}, \aleph_{\alpha}))\): The  union of denumerably many sets each of power \(\aleph_{\alpha }\) has power \(\aleph_{\alpha}\). Moore, G. [1982], p 36.

31:

\(UT(\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0})\): The countable union theorem:  The union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets is denumerable.

6:

\(UT(\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\Bbb R)\): The union of a denumerable  family  of denumerable subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) is denumerable.

5:

\(C(\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\Bbb R)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty denumerable subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) has a choice function.

38:

\({\Bbb R}\) is not the union of a countable family of countable sets.

Comment:

Back