Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

16 \(\Rightarrow\) 19 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
16 \(\Rightarrow\) 352	On first and second countable spaces and the axiom of choice, Gutierres, G 2004, Topology and its Applications.
352 \(\Rightarrow\) 31	On first and second countable spaces and the axiom of choice, Gutierres, G 2004, Topology and its Applications.
31 \(\Rightarrow\) 34	clear
34 \(\Rightarrow\) 19	Sur les fonctions representables analytiquement, Lebesgue, H. 1905, J. Math. Pures Appl.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
16:	\(C(\aleph_{0},\le 2^{\aleph_{0}})\): Every denumerable collection of non-empty sets each with power \(\le 2^{\aleph_{0}}\) has a choice function.
352:	A countable product of second countable spaces is second countable.
31:	\(UT(\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0})\): The countable union theorem: The union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets is denumerable.
34:	\(\aleph_{1}\) is regular.
19:	A real function is analytically representable if and only if it is in Baire's classification. G.Moore [1982], equation (2.3.1).

Comment:

Back