Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

101 \(\Rightarrow\) 296 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
101 \(\Rightarrow\) 40	On some weak forms of the axiom of choice in set theory, Pelc, A. 1978, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39	clear
39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8	clear
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 9	Was sind und was sollen die Zollen?, Dedekind, [1888]
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 296	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
101:	Partition Principle: If \(S\) is a partition of \(M\), then \(S \precsim M\).
40:	\(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.
39:	\(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202.
8:	\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):
9:	Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.
296:	Part-\(\infty\): Every infinite set is the disjoint union of infinitely many infinite sets.

Comment:

Back