Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

101 \(\Rightarrow\) 26 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
101 \(\Rightarrow\) 40	On some weak forms of the axiom of choice in set theory, Pelc, A. 1978, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39	clear
39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8	clear
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 24	clear
24 \(\Rightarrow\) 26	Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, 66 Le¸cons sur la th´eorie des fonctions, Borel, [1898]

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
101:	Partition Principle: If \(S\) is a partition of \(M\), then \(S \precsim M\).
40:	\(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.
39:	\(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202.
8:	\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):
24:	\(C(\aleph_0,2^{(2^{\aleph_0})})\): Every denumerable collection of non-empty sets each with power \(2^{(2^{\aleph_{0}})}\) has a choice function.
26:	\(UT(\aleph_{0},2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}})\): The union of denumerably many sets each of power \(2^{\aleph _{0}}\) has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\).

Comment:

Back