Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

101 $\Rightarrow$ 106 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
101 $\Rightarrow$ 40	On some weak forms of the axiom of choice in set theory, Pelc, A. 1978, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.
40 $\Rightarrow$ 43	Consistency results for $ZF$, Jensen, R.B. 1967, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. On cardinals and their successors, Jech, T. 1966a, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.
43 $\Rightarrow$ 106	Injectivity, projectivity and the axiom of choice, Blass, A. 1979, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. On the role of the Baire category theorem and dependent choice in the foundations of logic, Goldblatt, R. 1985, J. Symbolic Logic

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
101:	Partition Principle: If $S$ is a partition of $M$, then $S \precsim M$.
40:	$C(WO,\infty)$: Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.
43:	$DC(\omega)$ (DC), Principle of Dependent Choices: If $S$ is a relation on a non-empty set $A$ and $(\forall x\in A) (\exists y\in A)(x S y)$ then there is a sequence $a(0), a(1), a(2), \ldots$ of elements of $A$ such that $(\forall n\in\omega)(a(n)\mathrel S a(n+1))$. See Tarski [1948], p 96, Levy [1964], p. 136.
106:	Baire Category Theorem for Compact Hausdorff Spaces: Every compact Hausdorff space is Baire.

Comment:

Back

Implication	Reference
101 \(\Rightarrow\) 40	On some weak forms of the axiom of choice in set theory, Pelc, A. 1978, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 43	Consistency results for $ZF$, Jensen, R.B. 1967, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. On cardinals and their successors, Jech, T. 1966a, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.
43 \(\Rightarrow\) 106	Injectivity, projectivity and the axiom of choice, Blass, A. 1979, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. On the role of the Baire category theorem and dependent choice in the foundations of logic, Goldblatt, R. 1985, J. Symbolic Logic

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
101:	Partition Principle: If \(S\) is a partition of \(M\), then \(S \precsim M\).
40:	\(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.
43:	\(DC(\omega)\) (DC), Principle of Dependent Choices: If \(S\) is a relation on a non-empty set \(A\) and \((\forall x\in A) (\exists y\in A)(x S y)\) then there is a sequence \(a(0), a(1), a(2), \ldots\) of elements of \(A\) such that \((\forall n\in\omega)(a(n)\mathrel S a(n+1))\). See Tarski [1948], p 96, Levy [1964], p. 136.
106:	Baire Category Theorem for Compact Hausdorff Spaces: Every compact Hausdorff space is Baire.