Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

101 \(\Rightarrow\) 92 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
101 \(\Rightarrow\) 40	On some weak forms of the axiom of choice in set theory, Pelc, A. 1978, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 337	clear
337 \(\Rightarrow\) 92	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
101:	Partition Principle: If \(S\) is a partition of \(M\), then \(S \precsim M\).
40:	\(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.
337:	\(C(WO\), uniformly linearly ordered): If \(X\) is a well ordered collection of non-empty sets and there is a function \(f\) defined on \(X\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a linear ordering of \(x\), then there is a choice function for \(X\).
92:	\(C(WO,{\Bbb R})\): Every well ordered family of non-empty subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) has a choice function.

Comment:

Back