Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

123 \(\Rightarrow\) 11
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
123 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 Two model theoretic ideas in independence proofs, Pincus, D. 1976, Fund. Math.
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 clear
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 11 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
123:

\(SPI^*\): Uniform weak ultrafilter principle: For each family \(F\) of infinite sets \(\exists f\) such that \(\forall x\in F\), \(f(x)\) is a non-principal ultrafilter on \(x\).

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

61:

\((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element  sets has a choice function.

11:

A Form of Restricted Choice for Families of Finite Sets: For every infinite set \(A\), \(A\) has an infinite subset \(B\) such that for every \(n\in\omega\), \(n>0\), the set of all \(n\) element subsets of \(B\) has a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b]

Comment:

Back