We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
408 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 | clear |
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 250 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
408: | If \(\{f_i: i\in I\}\) is a family of functions such that for each \(i\in I\), \(f_i\subseteq E\times W\), where \(E\) and \(W\) are non-empty sets, and \(\cal B\) is a filter base on \(I\) such that
|
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
61: | \((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. |
250: | \((\forall n\in\omega-\{0,1\})(C(WO,n))\): For every natural number \(n\ge 2\), every well ordered family of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. |
Comment: