We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
149 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 |
The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic note-26 |
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 375 | note-139 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
149: | \(A(F)\): Every \(T_2\) topological space is a continuous, finite to one image of an \(A1\) space. |
67: | \(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite). |
375: | Tietze-Urysohn Extension Theorem: If \((X,T)\) is a normal topological space, \(A\) is closed in \(X\), and \(f: A\to [0,1]\) is continuous, then there exists a continuous function \(g: X\to [0,1]\) which extends \(f\). |
Comment: