Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

149 \(\Rightarrow\) 131 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
149 \(\Rightarrow\) 67	The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic note-26
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 76	clear
76 \(\Rightarrow\) 131	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
149:	\(A(F)\): Every \(T_2\) topological space is a continuous, finite to one image of an \(A1\) space.
67:	\(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite).
76:	\(MC_\omega(\infty,\infty)\) (\(\omega\)-MC): For every family \(X\) of pairwise disjoint non-empty sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for each \(x\in X\), f(x) is a non-empty countable subset of \(x\).
131:	\(MC_\omega(\aleph_0,\infty)\): For every denumerable family \(X\) of pairwise disjoint non-empty sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for each \(x\in X\), f(x) is a non-empty countable subset of \(x\).

Comment:

Back