We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 149 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 |
The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic note-26 |
| 67 \(\Rightarrow\) 126 | clear |
| 126 \(\Rightarrow\) 82 | note-76 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 149: | \(A(F)\): Every \(T_2\) topological space is a continuous, finite to one image of an \(A1\) space. |
| 67: | \(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite). |
| 126: | \(MC(\aleph_0,\infty)\), Countable axiom of multiple choice: For every denumerable set \(X\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in X\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty finite subset of \(y\). |
| 82: | \(E(I,III)\) (Howard/Yorke [1989]): If \(X\) is infinite then \(\cal P(X)\) is Dedekind infinite. (\(X\) is finite \(\Leftrightarrow {\cal P}(X)\) is Dedekind finite.) |
Comment: