Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

149 \(\Rightarrow\) 414
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
149 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
note-26
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 144 Axioms of multiple choice, Levy, A. 1962, Fund. Math.
144 \(\Rightarrow\) 414 Constructive order theory, Ern'e, M. 2001, Math. Logic Quart.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
149:

\(A(F)\):  Every \(T_2\) topological space is a continuous, finite to one image of an \(A1\) space.

67:

\(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite).

144:

Every set is almost well orderable.

414:

Every \(\cal W\)-frame is a \(\cal D\)-frame.  \ac{Ern\'e} \cite{2000}

Comment:

Back