Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

149 \(\Rightarrow\) 349
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
149 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
note-26
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 329 clear
329 \(\Rightarrow\) 349 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
149:

\(A(F)\):  Every \(T_2\) topological space is a continuous, finite to one image of an \(A1\) space.

67:

\(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite).

329:

\(MC(\infty,WO)\): For  every set \(M\) of well orderable sets such that for all \(x\in X\), \(|x|\ge 1\), there is a function \(f\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\).  (See Form 67.)

349:

\(MC(\infty,\aleph_0)\): For every set \(X\) of non-empty denumerable sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\).

Comment:

Back