Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

149 \(\Rightarrow\) 397 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
149 \(\Rightarrow\) 67	The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic note-26
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 112	clear
112 \(\Rightarrow\) 395	clear
395 \(\Rightarrow\) 397	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
149:	\(A(F)\): Every \(T_2\) topological space is a continuous, finite to one image of an \(A1\) space.
67:	\(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite).
112:	\(MC(\infty,LO)\): For every family \(X\) of non-empty sets each of which can be linearly ordered there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in X\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty finite subset of \(y\).
395:	\(MC(LO,LO)\): For each linearly ordered family of non-empty linearly orderable sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\).
397:	\(MC(WO,LO)\): For each well ordered family of non-empty linearly orderable sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\).

Comment:

Back