We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

147 \(\Rightarrow\) 74
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
147 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
note-26
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 79 clear
79 \(\Rightarrow\) 94 clear
94 \(\Rightarrow\) 74 note-10

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
147:

\(A(D2)\):  Every \(T_2\) topological space \((X,T)\) can be covered by a well ordered family of discrete sets.

91:

\(PW\):  The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered.

79:

\({\Bbb R}\) can be well ordered.  Hilbert [1900], p 263.

94:

\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty,{\Bbb R})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty sets of reals  has a choice function. Jech [1973b], p 148 prob 10.1.

74:

For every \(A\subseteq\Bbb R\) the following are equivalent:

  1. \(A\) is closed and bounded.
  2. Every sequence \(\{x_{n}\}\subseteq A\) has a convergent subsequence with limit in A.
Jech [1973b], p 21.

Comment:

Back