We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
147 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 |
The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic note-26 |
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 79 | clear |
79 \(\Rightarrow\) 139 | |
139 \(\Rightarrow\) 137-k |
Cancellation laws for surjective cardinals, Truss, J. K. 1984, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
147: | \(A(D2)\): Every \(T_2\) topological space \((X,T)\) can be covered by a well ordered family of discrete sets. |
91: | \(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered. |
79: | \({\Bbb R}\) can be well ordered. Hilbert [1900], p 263. |
139: | Using the discrete topology on 2, \(2^{\cal P(\omega)}\) is compact. |
137-k: | Suppose \(k\in\omega-\{0\}\). If \(f\) is a 1-1 map from \(k\times X\) into \(k\times Y\) then there are partitions \(X = \bigcup_{i \le k} X_{i} \) and \(Y = \bigcup_{i \le k} Y_{i} \) of \(X\) and \(Y\) such that \(f\) maps \(\bigcup_{i \le k} (\{i\} \times X_{i})\) onto \(\bigcup_{i \le k} (\{i\} \times Y_{i})\). |
Comment: