We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
147 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 |
The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic note-26 |
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 305 | Equivalents of the Axiom of Choice II, Rubin, 1985, theorem 5.7 |
305 \(\Rightarrow\) 307 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
147: | \(A(D2)\): Every \(T_2\) topological space \((X,T)\) can be covered by a well ordered family of discrete sets. |
91: | \(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered. |
305: | There are \(2^{\aleph_0}\) Vitali equivalence classes. (Vitali equivalence classes are equivalence classes of the real numbers under the relation \(x\equiv y\leftrightarrow(\exists q\in{\Bbb Q})(x-y=q)\).). \ac{Kanovei} \cite{1991}. |
307: | If \(m\) is the cardinality of the set of Vitali equivalence classes, then \(H(m) = H(2^{\aleph_0})\), where \(H\) is Hartogs aleph function and the {\it Vitali equivalence classes} are equivalence classes of the real numbers under the relation \(x\equiv y\leftrightarrow(\exists q\in {\Bbb Q})(x-y=q)\). |
Comment: