We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
147 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 |
The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic note-26 |
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 361 | Equivalents of the Axiom of Choice II, Rubin, 1985, theorem 5.7 |
361 \(\Rightarrow\) 362 | Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, page 325 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
147: | \(A(D2)\): Every \(T_2\) topological space \((X,T)\) can be covered by a well ordered family of discrete sets. |
91: | \(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered. |
361: | In \(\Bbb R\), the union of a denumerable number of analytic sets is analytic. G. Moore [1982], pp 181 and 325. |
362: | In \(\Bbb R\), every Borel set is analytic. G. Moore [1982], pp 181 and 325. |
Comment: