Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

101 \(\Rightarrow\) 369
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
101 \(\Rightarrow\) 100 clear
100 \(\Rightarrow\) 369 Communication sur les recherches de la th'eorie des ensembles, Lindenbaum, A. 1926, C. R. Soc. Sci. Lett. Varsovie

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
101:

Partition Principle:  If \(S\) is a partition of \(M\), then \(S \precsim M\).

100:

Weak Partition Principle:  For all sets \(x\) and \(y\), if \(x\precsim^* y\), then it is not the case that \(y\prec x\).

369:

If \(\Bbb R\) is partitioned into two sets, at least one of them has cardinality \(2^{\aleph_0}\).

Comment:

Back