We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
399 \(\Rightarrow\) 323 | clear |
323 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | note-70 |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 102 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 162 problem 11.12 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
399: | \(KW(\infty,LO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a set of linearly orderable sets: For every set of linearly orderable sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). |
323: | \(KW(\infty,WO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a family of well orderable sets: For every set \(M\) of well orderable sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.) |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
102: | For all Dedekind finite cardinals \(p\) and \(q\), if \(p^{2} = q^{2}\) then \(p = q\). Jech [1973b], p 162 prob 11.12. |
Comment: