Implications

This non-implication, Form 102 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 407, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 1675, whose string of implications is:
    15 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 \(\Rightarrow\) 102
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 126, Form 15 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 14 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 15 <p> \(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), <strong>The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle:</strong> For every  set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See <a href="/form-classes/howard-rubin-81($n$)">Form 81(\(n\))</a>.   </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 14 <p> <strong>BPI:</strong> Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9601, whose string of implications is:
    407 \(\Rightarrow\) 14

The conclusion Form 102 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 407 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal M3\) Mathias' model Mathias proves that the \(FM\) model <a href="/models/Mathias-Pincus-1">\(\cal N4\)</a> can be transformed into a model of \(ZF\), \(\cal M3\)

Edit | Back