Implications

This non-implication, Form 357 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 29, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:
Note: This non-implication is actually a code 4, as this non-implication satisfies the transferability criterion. Click Transfer details for all the details)

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 1892, whose string of implications is:
    23 \(\Rightarrow\) 27 \(\Rightarrow\) 31 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 \(\Rightarrow\) 357
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 34, Form 23 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 29 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 23 <p> \((\forall \alpha)(UT(\aleph_{\alpha},\aleph_{\alpha}, \aleph_{\alpha}))\): For every ordinal \(\alpha\), if \(A\) and every member of \(A\) has cardinality \(\aleph_{\alpha}\), then \(|\bigcup A| = \aleph _{\alpha }\). </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 29  If \(|S| = \aleph_{0}\) and \(\{A_{x}: x\in S\}\) and \(\{B_{x}: x\in S\}\) are families of pairwise disjoint sets and \(|A_{x}| = |B_{x}|\) for all \(x\in S\), then \(|\bigcup^{}_{x\in S} A_{x}| = |\bigcup^{}_{x\in S} B_{x}|\). <a href="/books/2">Moore, G. [1982]</a>, p 324. </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 357 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 29 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N39\) Howard's Model II \(A\) is denumerable and is a disjoint union\(\bigcup_{i\in\omega}B_i\cup\bigcup_{i\in\omega}C_i\), where for all\(i\in\omega, |B_i|=|C_i|=\aleph_0\)

Edit | Back