We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
			
| Implication | Reference | 
|---|---|
| 359 \(\Rightarrow\) 20 | clear | 
| 20 \(\Rightarrow\) 101 | 
							 	Partition principles and infinite sums of cardinal numbers, Higasikawa,  M. 1995, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic  | 
					
| 101 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 | 
							 	On some weak forms of the axiom of choice in set theory, Pelc,  A. 1978, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.  | 
					
| 40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 | clear | 
| 39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 | clear | 
| 8 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 | 								Was sind und was sollen die Zollen?, Dedekind, [1888] | 
					
| 9 \(\Rightarrow\) 64 | 
							 	The independence of various definitions of finiteness, Levy,  A. 1958, Fund. Math.  clear  | 
					
| 64 \(\Rightarrow\) 390 | clear | 
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement | 
|---|---|
| 359: | If \(\{A_{x}: x\in S\}\) and \(\{B_{x}: x\in S\}\) are families of pairwise disjoint sets and \( |A_{x}| \le |B_{x}|\) for all \(x\in S\), then \(|\bigcup_{x\in S}A_{x}| \le |\bigcup_{x\in S} B_{x}|\).  | 
					
| 20: | If \(\{A_{x}: x \in S \}\) and \(\{B_{x}: x \in S\}\) are families of pairwise disjoint sets and \( |A_{x}| = |B_{x}|\) for all \(x\in S\), then \(|\bigcup_{x\in S}A_{x}| = |\bigcup_{x\in S} B_{x}|\). Moore [1982] (1.4.12 and 1.7.8).  | 
					
| 101: | Partition Principle: If \(S\) is a partition of \(M\), then \(S \precsim M\).  | 
					
| 40: | \(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.  | 
					
| 39: | \(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202.  | 
					
| 8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):  | 
					
| 9: | Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.  | 
					
| 64: | \(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.)  | 
					
| 390: | Every infinite set can be partitioned either into two infinite sets or infinitely many sets, each of which has at least two elements. Ash [1983].  | 
					
Comment: